*** previous/general-filters.xml	2008-09-28 14:59:48.000000000 +1000
--- current/general-filters.xml	2008-09-28 14:59:48.000000000 +1000
***************
*** 191,203 ****
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <val>
!                     (
!                       xfi:is-instant-period(.)) and 
!                       xfi:period-instant(xfi:period(.)) lt xfi:scenario(.)/eg:restatementDate
!                     ) or
!                     (
!                       xfi:is-start-end-period(.)) and 
!                       xfi:period-end(xfi:period(.)) lt xfi:scenario(.)/eg:restatementDate
                      )
                    </val>
                  </td>
--- 191,203 ----
                <tr>
                  <td>
                    <val>
!                     ( 
!                       xfi:is-instant-period(xfi:period(.)) and 
!                       (xfi:period-instant(xfi:period(.)) lt xfi:scenario(.)/eg:restatementDate)
!                     ) or 
!                     ( 
!                       xfi:is-start-end-period(xfi:period(.)) and 
!                       (xfi:period-end(xfi:period(.)) lt  xfi:scenario(.)/eg:restatementDate)
                      )
                    </val>
                  </td>
***************
*** 311,316 ****
--- 311,325 ----
            </p>
          </revision>
  
+         <revision ref="person-geoff" day="14" month="04" year="2008">
+           <p>
+             Changed the general filter XPath expression in the first example for the comparison of period information
+             to scenario restatement date information to balance the parentheses and to use the 
+             <elt>xbrli:period</elt> element as the function argument for period functions rather than the 
+             <elt>xbrli:item</elt> element.  These problems were identified by <personref ref="person-muramoto"/>.
+           </p>
+         </revision>        
+ 
        </revisions>
  
      </section>
