http://www.xbrl.org/2006/role/restatedLabel ACK 2006-02-21 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/restated-2006-02-21.xsd#restatedLabel At times an entity may restate certain account balances for financial reporting purposes. This may only occur according to specific reporting rules. For example, an entity may restate an equity account balance, say "Reserves", due to an accounting change or fundamental error under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). A separate label role is provided for such reporting of restated amounts, should they occur. The restated amount within a financial statement might provide a label such as "Reserves, Restated Balance" to which this label role would be assigned to identify this type of label. Taxonomy creators would use this label role and provide a label which could be used on concepts that could be restated. Typically, these would be used on equity accounts. The label for a concept when presenting values that have been restated from their value as originally reported. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://xbrl.us/us-gaap/role/label/negated REC 2009-04-30 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2008-03-31.xsd#negated Users need a way to indicate that when a numeric value is displayed, it should be presented multiplied by -1, which may also require a change in the label. When this label is the preferred label on a presentation arc whose target is an element having a numeric type, a conforming processor will not only present the fact using the specified label but will also present the its fact values negated. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://xbrl.us/us-gaap/role/label/negatedPeriodEnd REC 2009-04-30 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2008-03-31.xsd#negatedPeriodEnd Users need a way to indicate that when a numeric value is displayed, it should be presented multiplied by -1, which may also require a change in the label. When this label is the preferred label on a presentation arc whose target is element having a numeric type, a conforming processor will not only present the fact using the specified label but will also present the its fact values negated. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://xbrl.us/us-gaap/role/label/negatedPeriodStart REC 2009-04-30 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2008-03-31.xsd#negatedPeriodStart Users need a way to indicate that when a numeric value is displayed, it should be presented multiplied by -1, which may also require a change in the label. When this label is the preferred label on a presentation arc whose target is an element having a numeric type, a conforming processor will not only present the fact using the specified label but will also present the its fact values negated. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://xbrl.us/us-gaap/role/label/negatedTotal REC 2009-04-30 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2008-03-31.xsd#negatedTotal Users need a way to indicate that when a numeric value is displayed, it should be presented multiplied by -1, which may also require a change in the label. When this label is the preferred label on a presentation arc whose target is an element having a numeric type, a conforming processor will not only present the fact using the specified label but will also present the its fact values negated. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/periodStartNegativeLabel ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RolePeriodStartNegativeLabel The role periodStartNegativeLabel is needed because this is a frequent convention used for indicating negative value at the beginning of the period, for example:"Deficit of the beginning of the period" Label that indicates negative value at the beginning of the period. For instance, "Deficit of the beginning of the period". 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/periodEndNegativeLabel ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RolePeriodEndNegativeLabel The role periodEndNegativeLabel is needed because this is a frequent convention used for indicating negative value at the end of the period, for example:"Deficit of the end of the period" Label that indicates term end negative value.　For instance, "Deficit of the end of the period". 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/positiveOrNegativeLabel ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RolePositiveOrNegativeLabel The role positiveOrNegativeLabel is needed because this is a frequent convention used for indicating positive or negative value, for example:"Operating profit or operating loss" Label that indicates positive value or negative value.　For instance, "Operating profit or operating loss" 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/periodStartPositiveOrNegativeLabel ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RolePeriodStartPositiveOrNegativeLabel The role periodStartPositiveOrNegativeLabel is needed because this is a frequent convention used for indicating positive or negative value at the beginning of the period, for example:"Surplus at the beginning of the period and deficit at the beginning of the period" Label that indicates positive value or negative value at the beginning of the period. For instance, "Surplus at the beginning of the period and deficit at the beginning of the period". 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/periodEndPositiveOrNegativeLabel ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RolePeriodEndPositiveOrNegativeLabel The role periodEndPositiveOrNegativeLabel is needed because this is a frequent convention used for indicating positive or negative value at the end of the period, for example:"Surplus at the end of the period and deficit at the end of the period" Label that indicates positive value or negative value at the end of the period. For instance, "Surplus at the end of the period and deficit at the end of the period". 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/NotesNumber IWD 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RoleNotesNumber The role NotesNumber is needed because this is a frequent convention used for indicating note number,for example:"*1 1,000". "*1" is note number in this example. Footnote that shows note number. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/NotesNumberPeriodStart IWD 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RoleNotesNumberPeriodStart The role NotesNumberPeriodStart indicates a note number only when it appears on a beginning balance, such as with preferredLabel of periodStart. Footnote that shows note number at the beginning of the period. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/role/NotesNumberPeriodEnd IWD 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/jpfr-role-2007-11-07.xsd#RoleNotesNumberPeriodEnd The role NotesNumberPeriodEnd iindicates a note number only when it appears on an ending balance, such as with preferredLabel of periodEnd. Footnote that shows note number at the end of the period. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negatedLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2009-12-16.xsd#negatedLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented should be negated (sign of the value should be "flipped"). For example, the standard and standard positive labels might be "profit (loss) after tax" and the negated labels "loss (profit) after tax". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negatedPeriodEndLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2009-12-16.xsd#negatedPeriodEndLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented should be negated (sign of the value should be "flipped"). For example, the standard and standard positive labels might be "profit (loss) after tax" and the negated labels "loss (profit) after tax". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negatedPeriodStartLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2009-12-16.xsd#negatedPeriodStartLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented should be negated (sign of the value should be "flipped"). For example, the standard and standard positive labels might be "profit (loss) after tax" and the negated labels "loss (profit) after tax". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negatedTotalLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2009-12-16.xsd#negatedTotalLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented should be negated (sign of the value should be "flipped"). For example, the standard and standard positive labels might be "profit (loss) after tax" and the negated labels "loss (profit) after tax". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negatedNetLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2009-12-16.xsd#negatedNetLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented should be negated (sign of the value should be "flipped"). For example, the standard and standard positive labels might be "profit (loss) after tax" and the negated labels "loss (profit) after tax". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negatedTerseLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negated-2009-12-16.xsd#negatedTerseLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented should be negated (sign of the value should be "flipped"). For example, the standard and standard positive labels might be "profit (loss) after tax" and the negated labels "loss (profit) after tax". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negativePeriodStartLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negative-2009-12-16.xsd#negativePeriodStartLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is negative. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negativePeriodEndLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negative-2009-12-16.xsd#negativePeriodEndLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is negative. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negativePeriodStartTotalLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negative-2009-12-16.xsd#negativePeriodStartTotalLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is negative. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negativePeriodEndTotalLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/negative-2009-12-16.xsd#negativePeriodEndTotalLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is negative. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/positivePeriodStartLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/positive-2009-12-16.xsd#positivePeriodStartLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is positive. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/positivePeriodEndLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/positive-2009-12-16.xsd#positivePeriodEndLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is positive. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/positivePeriodStartTotalLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/positive-2009-12-16.xsd#positivePeriodStartTotalLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is positive. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/positivePeriodEndTotalLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/positive-2009-12-16.xsd#positivePeriodEndTotalLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Label for a concept, when the value being presented is positive. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/netLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/net-2009-12-16.xsd#netLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. The label for a concept for use in presenting values associated with the concept when it is being reported as the net of a set of other values. Net labels allows for expressing different labels than the one which would be used as total label if the presentation tree represents gross/net calculation instead of traditional calculation roll-up. For example standard label for "Property, plant and equipment" can have total label "Total property, plant and equipment" and net label "Net property, plant and equipment". 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/deprecatedLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#deprecatedLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. The label for a concept indicating that the concept has been deprecated, with further explanation as needed. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/deprecatedDateLabel REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#deprecatedDateLabel Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. The label for a concept containing only the date as of which the concept was deprecated. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/commonPracticeRef REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/reference-2009-12-16.xsd#commonPracticeRef Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Reference for common practice disclosure relating to the concept. Replaces former reference to common practice (ie using part name with value IFRS-CP) and enables common practice reference to a given point in a literature (for example commonPracticeRef to Name:IAS, Number:16, Paragraph:24). The content of the common practice disclosure is the same as other references (so for example contains parts Name, Number, IssueDate, Paragraph). 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/nonauthoritativeLiteratureRef REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/reference-2009-12-16.xsd#nonauthoritativeLiteratureRef Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Reference to non-authoritative literature. Can be used to relate a concept to additional literature (academic literature, accounting firm guidelines, entity-specific guidelines, etc.). 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/recognitionRef REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/role/reference-2009-12-16.xsd#recognitionRef Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Reference for recognition and derecognition. Enables the expression of additional financial reporting semantic for a concept. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/arcrole/Gross-Net ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/jpfr-arcrole-2007-11-07.xsd#ArcroleGrossNet The arcrole Gross-Net is needed to relate gross element to net element. The arcrole to relate gross element to net element. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false prohibited prohibited http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/arcrole/Gross-Allowance ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/jpfr-arcrole-2007-11-07.xsd#ArcroleGrossAllowance The arcrole Gross-Allowance is needed to allowance element. The arcrole to relate gross element to allowance element. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false prohibited prohibited http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/arcrole/Gross-AccumulatedDepreciation ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/jpfr-arcrole-2007-11-07.xsd#ArcroleGrossAccumulatedDepreciation The arcrole Gross-AccumulatedDepreciation is needed to relate gross element to accumulated depreciation element. The arcrole to relate gross element to accumulated depreciation element. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false prohibited prohibited http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/arcrole/Gross-AccumulatedImpairmentLoss ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/jpfr-arcrole-2007-11-07.xsd#ArcroleGrossAccumulatedImpairmentLoss The arcrole Gross-AccumulatedImpairmentLoss is needed to relate gross element to accumulated impairment loss element. The arcrole to relate gross element to accumulated impairment loss element. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false prohibited prohibited http://info.edinet-fsa.go.jp/jp/fr/gaap/arcrole/Gross-AccumulatedDepreciationAndImpairmentLoss ACK 2007-11-07 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/jpfr-arcrole-2007-11-07.xsd#ArcroleGrossAccumulatedDepreciationAndImpairmentLoss The arcrole Gross-AccumulatedDepreciationAndImpairmentLoss is needed to relate gross element to accumulated depreciation and impairment loss element. The arcrole to relate gross element to accumulated depreciation and impairment loss element. 2.1 2004-11-14 false false prohibited prohibited http://www.xbrl.org/2009/arcrole/fact-explanatoryFact REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/factExplanatory-2009-12-16.xsd#fact-explanatoryFact Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Arcrole for linking fact with explanatory fact in instance document footnote link. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false prohibited prohibited http://www.xbrl.org/2009/arcrole/dep-concept-deprecatedConcept REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#dep-concept-deprecatedConcept Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Indicates what the replacement concepts is for the deprecated concept is. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false prohibited prohibited http://www.xbrl.org/2009/arcrole/dep-aggregateConcept-deprecatedPartConcept REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#dep-aggregateConcept-deprecatedPartConcept Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Indicates that the deprecated concept is combined with another deprecated concept to a define a new replacement concept. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false prohibited prohibited http://www.xbrl.org/2009/arcrole/dep-dimensionallyQualifiedConcept-deprecatedConcept REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#dep-dimensionallyQualifiedConcept-deprecatedConcept Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Indicates that the deprecated concept has been qualified by a dimension. The item is removed because that same value now appears in a table. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false prohibited prohibited http://www.xbrl.org/2009/arcrole/dep-mutuallyExclusiveConcept-deprecatedConcept REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#dep-mutuallyExclusiveConcept-deprecatedConcept Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Indicates that the deprecated concept can be replaced by 2 or more replacement items but cannot be split between the replacement concepts. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false prohibited prohibited http://www.xbrl.org/2009/arcrole/dep-partConcept-deprecatedAggregateConcept REC 2010-10-25 http://www.xbrl.org/lrr/arcrole/deprecated-2009-12-16.xsd#dep-partConcept-deprecatedAggregateConcept Interoperable Taxonomy Architecture (ITA) initiative requirement for alignment of the EDINET, IFRS and US GAAP taxonomies. Indicates that the deprecated concept can be replaced by 2 or more replacement items and can be split between the replacement concepts as the issuer deems appropriate. 2.1 2003-12-31 false false prohibited prohibited